Tighter regulation of nicotine alternatives: experts warn of dangerous consequences
The Ministry of Health, led by Vlastimil Válek (TOP 09), recently tightened regulations on alternative nicotine products such as electronic cigarettes, heated tobacco and nicotine sachets. These products, which are considered less harmful than traditional cigarettes, have become the target of new legislation which, among other things, has introduced a higher excise duty and plans to ban flavours in e-cigarette refills. The move has sparked a wave of criticism not only among users but especially among addiction experts.
Doctors and addiction specialists have long stressed that nicotine alternatives are less dangerous than conventional cigarettes. While traditional cigarettes release harmful substances when they burn, which are the main culprit in the high morbidity and mortality rates of smokers, e-cigarettes and heated tobacco do not produce these substances. According to Viktor Mravchik, an addiction expert and director of research at Podané Ręce, a company that helps people get rid of addictions, nicotine is not the main problem, but rather tar and other toxic substances from burning tobacco.
xperts consider the ministry’s efforts to regulate these alternatives more strictly a misstep that may have the opposite effect of what the government intended. Many smokers who might switch to less harmful alternatives may be put off by losing access to products that offer them not only lower health risks but also a better experience through flavours. These are often the main motivators for switching from conventional cigarettes, not only for young people but also for long-time smokers.
In addition, there is a concern that strict regulation of alternative products may lead to a growing illegal market where no quality and safety standards will be respected. This could paradoxically increase the health risks that the government is trying to limit.
Against the background of these debates, the question arises as to whether current policy is genuinely oriented towards protecting public health or whether it is motivated by other interests. Experts are calling on the government to rethink its actions and focus on promoting less harmful alternatives that could contribute to an overall reduction in the smoking population and improve public health.
Photo source: www.pexels.com
Author of this article
WAS THIS ARTICLE HELPFUL?
Support us to keep up the good work and to provide you even better content. Your donations will be used to help students get access to quality content for free and pay our contributors’ salaries, who work hard to create this website content! Thank you for all your support!
OR CONTINUE READING